Policy Insights 5 | 2026

Closing the motherhood pension gap

Sarah Schmauk & Michaela Kreyenfeld

Germany has had a childcare pension credit system since 1986, awarding pension entitlements to main child-carers (most often women) for up to three years. Yet the “motherhood pension gap” in Germany remains wide. Did the policy simply miss its mark? Our analysis shows that childcare credits have substantially reduced the motherhood pension gap for women born between 1952 and 1959. However, the policy’s overall impact is limited – because of a broader family policy context that often makes it difficult for mothers to return to paid employment after childbirth.

This Policy Insight is based on an article published in the Journal ‘Work, Aging and Retirement’ in April 2026: https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waag006.

Background

A “motherhood pension gap” persists across Europe, meaning that on average, mothers receive lower pensions than what women without children receive. How can this gap be closed? We present key insights from our policy evaluation of Germany’s pension-related childcare credits.

Why this matters

On average, women receive considerably lower earnings in the labour market than men, and this has implications for their retirement income. In 2024, the “gender pension gap” in the European Union was 25%, meaning that overall, women received 25% less pension income than men (Eurostat). As a result, women face a higher risk of poverty in older age, greater financial dependency on partners, and lower financial resilience.

Pension inequalities also exist among women. The “motherhood pension gap” refers to differences in pension entitlements between women with and without children. It captures the extent to which becoming a mother is associated with lower pension entitlements later in life.

The European Commission recently adopted a Gender Equality Strategy for 2026-2030 in which they set as a key objective to close the gender pension gap – specifically, “through addressing its drivers, monitoring its evolution and building on best practices”.

To contribute to the monitoring, this Policy Insight provides key take-aways from our evaluation of pension-related childcare credits – a policy in Germany that aims to strengthen pension entitlements for women with children, by recognising periods spent raising children. Introduced in 1986, these credits were part of a broader restructuring of the German pension system, which also included changes to survivor pensions. Our study aimed to understand to what extent these credits have increased mothers’ individual pension entitlements, and therefore contributed to reducing economic inequalities in later life.

Key Insights from Germany

Career interruptions associated with child-rearing are a key driver of pension inequalities in Germany. This is reflected both in the gender pension gap (GPG) – the difference in pension entitlements between women and men – as well as in the motherhood pension gap (MPG), which compares the pension entitlements between women with and without children.

In 1986, West Germany introduced pension-related childcare credits, which were later extended to the entire country after reunification. Did this policy reduce the motherhood pension gap?

The short answer from our research is: partly. The childcare credits substantially increased pension entitlements for women with children, and therefore have reduced the motherhood pension gap in Germany. However, among those women analysed in our study (born in Germany between 1952 and 1959), women with children still receive lower pension entitlements than women without children. This “motherhood pension gap” increases with each additional child. Among West German women with three or more children, the gap reaches around 34%.

To conduct our policy analysis, we modelled an “alternative world” where women accumulated pension entitlements without childcare credits. In this scenario, women with children received pensions much lower than those of women without children. We then compared this with the “real world”, in which pension-related childcare credits are included. In the latter, the pension entitlements of women with children increased and the motherhood pension gap narrowed (see Figures 1a and 1b below).

However, our analysis also demonstrates that childcare credits do not entirely close the motherhood pension gap. The reason for this is that the policy is situated within broader structural conditions. The pension-related childcare credits in Germany cover only the first three years after a child’s birth. However, career interruptions among mothers, particularly in Western Germany, typically extend far beyond this period. As a result, the motherhood pension gap widens again after the childcare credit period ends. In Western Germany, longer employment interruptions have been common and socially accepted, with mothers often expected to rely on their husband’s pension or on later survivor benefits.

In East Germany, by contrast, broader public childcare availability, among other things, has enabled mothers to return to work relatively quickly after childbirth. Hence, even without pension-related childcare credits, there is almost no motherhood pension gap. Once they are included, all mothers, regardless of the number of children, receive higher pension entitlements than women without children (see Figures 2a and 2b below). This German case therefore illustrates how policy outcomes depend on the broader institutional context.

Childcare credits in Germany

The main child-raising parent (usually the mother) receives one “earning point” per year, each year in the three years immediately following the birth of a child. One earning point is equal to the average annual earnings of all insured workers that year. These earning points are added to the pension contributions from their paid employment (up to an income ceiling).

Figure 1: The role of pension-related childcare credits in the motherhood pension gaps: Western Germany

Note: The motherhood pension gap indicates by how many percent the average pension entitlements of mothers differ from those of childless women. A negative gap implies that mothers have lower pension entitlements than childless women, while a positive gap indicates higher entitlements. Percentages are calculated based on unrounded pension entitlements; displayed pension amounts are rounded.

Figure 2: The role of pension-related childcare credits in the motherhood pension gaps: Eastern Germany

Note: The MPG indicates by how many percent the average pension entitlements of mothers differ from those of childless women. A negative MPG implies that mothers have lower pension entitlements than childless women, while a positive MPG indicates higher entitlements. Percentages are calculated based on unrounded pension entitlements; displayed pension amounts are rounded.

Insights for Policy

  • Pension-related childcare credits substantially increase pension entitlements for women with children and therefore remain an important policy instrument for reducing pension (and gender) inequalities.
  • For the cohorts analysed in our study however childcare credits alone, were not sufficient to eliminate the gender and motherhood pension gap, particularly in West Germany.
  • The effectiveness of childcare credits depends on the subsequent employment trajectories of women with children. Pension credits can compensate for short career interruptions, but they cannot offset long-term disadvantages resulting from weak labour market integration.
  • Policies that facilitate women’s continuous employment after childbirth, including affordable childcare and family-friendly workplaces, are therefore essential complements to pension-related childcare credits.

References

Schmauk, S., and Kreyenfeld, M. (2026): “The motherhood pension gap in Germany: which role do the pension-related childcare credits play?” Work, Aging and Retirement, waag006. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waag006

Read also

Haan, P., Kreyenfeld, M., Schmauk, S., and Mika, T. (2025): “Rentenansprüche von Frauen bleiben mit steigender Kinderzahl deutlich hinter denen von Männern zurück”. DIW Wochenbericht (Nr. 12/2025). https://doi.org/10.18723/diw_wb:2025-12-1


Contributors

Sarah Schmauk is a postdoctoral researcher at the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities (BBAW) and the Einstein Center Population Diversity (ECPD). She can be reached at sarah.schmauk@bbaw.de.

Michaela Kreyenfeld is a Professor of Sociology at the Hertie School and the co-director of the Einstein Center Population Diversity (ECPD). She can be reached at kreyenfeld@hertie-school.org.

Fakhriyya Shiraliyeva is a student assistant at the Einstein Center Population Diversity (ECPD) and a student at Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. She does the graphic design for these series and can be reached at fakhriyya.shiraliyeva@charite.de.